Prediction of Antonia Schmidt [419th] vs Katherine Barnes [798th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
W L L L W L W W W LHead To Head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Barnes
They have played 3 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 2 and Barnes winning 1. The last match between Schmidt and Barnes was at the W35 Glasgow, 27-01-2025, Q3, I.hard with Antonia Schmidt getting the victory 3-6 6-2 10-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Antonia Schmidt | 1 |
| Katherine Barnes | 0 |
| Schmidt | Stats | Barnes |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (17-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (5-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 419 | Ranking | 798 |
| 419 | Highest Rank | 794 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (166-125) | Career Total W/L | 57% (45-34) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 10-3 |
Stats 
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Katherine Barnes
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:39:31 | Average Match Time | 1:39:31 |
| 54% (27/50) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/65) |
| 67% (18/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 54% (35/65) | Return Points Win % | 40% (20/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Antonia Schmidt vs Katherine Barnes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Barnes
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmidt has won 40.88% of points on their second serve, while Barnes has won 41.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmidt, in recent form, has won 49.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barnes has won 48.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.38% and 32.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmidt has saved 50.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barnes has saved 39.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmidt has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 40/ 25), with Barnes winning 55.32% (W/L 26/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 47/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 9/ 10). Barnes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 13/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 7/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.32% of matches (W/L 35/ 24), where as Barnes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.43% of matches (W/L 18/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmidt winning 1 times and Barnes being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 2 and Barnes winning 1. The last match between Schmidt and Barnes was at the W35 Glasgow, 27-01-2025, Q3, I.hard with Antonia Schmidt getting the victory 3-6 6-2 10-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmidt and Barnes have played a deciding set 1 times, with Schmidt winning 1 times and Barnes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmidt winning 0, and Barnes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.57 while Barnes has played against players with an average rank of 169.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmidt has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barnes has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmidt has converted 39.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barnes has converted 42.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Antonia Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Antonia Schmidt
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
88
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Sarah Iliev
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Lucia Cortez Llorca
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Antonia Schmidt
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
72
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Eri Shimizu
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Antonia Schmidt
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
10
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
59%
(
44 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Polina Iatcenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Katherine Barnes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
Player
Katherine Barnes
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
56%
(
40 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
14
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Katherine Barnes
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Catarina Ibiraba Melleiro
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Katherine Barnes
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Katherine Barnes
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
54%
(
31 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
52
|
1-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Schmidt vs Barnes?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Schmidt Vs Barnes is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (166/125) | Win/Loss | 57% (45/34) |
| 55% (359/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (98/81) |
| 52% (3205/2911) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (842/767) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 461 | Aces Total | 45 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 870 | Total Double Faults | 118 |
| 1:21:15 | Average Match Time | 1:19:14 |
| 212.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 147.38 |
| 63% (8947/14304) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2216/3729) |
| 63% (5648/8947) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1304/2216) |
| 46% (2440/5357) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (736/1513) |
| 46% (793/1733) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (229/467) |
| 45% (6333/14209) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1740/3735) |
| 57% (163/287) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (45/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (32/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (6/11) |
| 62% (48/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 88% (164/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (41/38) |
| 12% (164/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (41/3) |
| 17% (127/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (38/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
